How to protect our freedoms, strengthen developing economies, and make money
My Computerworld column finally came out this month, pointing back here. Only there were typos and omissions in the URLs. Also, a couple of the key notes here were incorrectly published in draft form, and got reedited. So let me summarize again, and reiterate the internal links.
1. There’s a whole section on privacy, censorship, and freedom, both domestic and abroad. You can also find a link to it in the left sidebar.
2. I proposed two modes of hands-on involvement in fighting authoritarian-government censorship and repression. One is to immediately adopt the quick-and-dirty tactics of http://www.irrepressible.info, by adding a little code to your websites. (I’ve done that already on four sites.) The other is to help me theorize about a badly needed next-generation improvement on those.
3. There’s a whole section on technology-related economic development (again, also accessible from the left sidebar), most of it added recently in connection with my preparations for or ruminations after TechLeb. The most actionable private-sector idea in the lot is probably this one.
Please help. Everybody can.
| Categories: Economic development, Privacy, censorship, and freedom, Public policy and privacy | 3 Comments |
New URL for my Computerworld columns
Computerworld‘s site redesign seems to have led to a change in the URL for my monthly column’s archives. It’s now:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/columnist.do?command=viewColumnist&bylineID=894
The good news is that you can now find about a year and a half of columns there, all of them with legible titles and descriptions.
| Categories: About this blog | Leave a Comment |
Second annual Text Analytics Summit
In Boston, June 22-23. Focused on text mining. VCs should consider going. My readers get a discount on their registration fees. More details here.
| Categories: Analytic technologies | Leave a Comment |
http://irrepressible.info in practice
Four days ago, I posted advocating putting code from irrepressible.info onto your site. The goal is to fight censorship by spreading censored text across as many web pages as follows. And as you can see from the green/yellow box in the upper left of this page, I followed my own advice.
Well, here’s my very preliminary report:
1. It looks ugly, and has a pair of mandatory outgong links to Amnesty International and irrepressible.info.
2. Since I picked a small size, there isn’t much text, and even so it’s hard to read.
3. Disappointingly, what little text there is doesn’t seem to change very often beyond a fixed rotating set of snippets.
4. I can’t detect a performance impact on my sites.
Well, there’s a lot more to do, but it’s at least a start.
Terrorism prevention in practice
The following comes from a family friend, Mike Grant, who happens to work for an IT vendor, Trilogy. He’s your typical white, American-accented, personable, well-mannered, well-organized, highly intelligent, highly articulate mid-20s Johns Hopkins graduate. Read more
Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?
I’ve argued long and loud that even the most secret of government probing needs to be done in some sense openly. That’s hardly a new observation with me. For example, David Brin argued the point effectively in The Transparent Society.
Tom Greene, however, makes the case even more effectively, in just one sentence:
It’s ironic that spooks so often remind us that we’ve got nothing to fear from their activities if we’ve got nothing nasty to hide, while they themselves are rarely comfortable without multiple layers of secrecy, anonymity and plausible deniability.
And he backs it up (actually, precedes it) in this excerpt:
The best conversation I had was with Robert van Bosbeek of the Dutch National Police. I asked him if he was tempted to buy anything.
“Not really,” he said with a laugh. “But it’s always good to see what’s on offer. Basically, we’re three or four years ahead of all this.”
He said that in the Netherlands, communications intercept capabilities are advanced and well established, and yet, in practice, less problematic than in many other countries. “Our legal system is more transparent,” he said, “so we can do what we need to do without controversy. Transparency makes law enforcement easier, not more difficult.”
Emphasis mine.
Sergei Brin doubts his course in China
From an AP story about a press conference given while he was visiting Capitol Hill for one-on-ones with senators:
Google Inc. co-founder Sergey Brin acknowledged Tuesday the dominant Internet company has compromised its principles by accommodating Chinese censorship demands. He said Google is wrestling to make the deal work before deciding whether to reverse course.
Freedom even without data privacy
To reiterate and expand on some points that I keep making:
- Governments are driving to build and integrate vast databanks of information about us. We can’t stop this.
- However, we can and should slow it and shape it.
- Since we can’t ultimately stop the collection of information, we also need to establish a whole new set of legal limits on the use of information.
- This is an urgent matter. What unfolds over the next few decades will largely be shaped over the next few years.
Fighting internet censorship
As I’ve written previously, fighting web and other internet censorship is getting urgent. Amnesty International* has started a project at irrepressible.info, to take censored web content and spread it around as many different web sites as possible. In principle, this is a great idea, and I’m participating, which is why you will shortly be able to see ugly yellow/green boxes with random article snippets on most of my blog pages.
Edit: When I redesigned my blogs, I gave up on irrepressible.info. I plan to explain why in another post.
What does worry me is the technology. Simply put, it would be very easy for the Chinese to filter out any web pages with that content, both the “framing content” (e.g., the Amnesty International and irrepressible.info links) and the news content itself. Thus, I see the program in its current form as just a transition measure, to buy time until a more sophisticated approach is devloped.
Paul Graham on making more Silicon Valleys
Scoble points out Paul Graham’s essay — turns out there’s more than one — one creating “silicon valleys” elsewhere. Some of the points are downright laughable, such as “it might be a lost cause to try to establish a silicon valley in Israel.” (Hellooo — how many countries in the world enjoy Israel’s per-capital technology startup success?) And despite the two essays’ length, I have trouble finding many specifics I actually agree with.
Even so, if you care about technology industry economic development, the essays are worth skimming.
Technorati Tags: Paul Graham, Silicon Valley, economic development
| Categories: Economic development, Public policy and privacy | 2 Comments |