May 23, 2006

Incubator possibilities and essentials in the developing world

I came away from TechLeb with some very interesting mixed messages about incubators, science parks, technology trade zones, whatever. (Jacques Masboungi’s talk on the subject was particularly interesting.) On the one hand, they seem to be one of the best things governments can do to foster technology development. On the other hand, they seem to be one of the easiest ways governments can screw up. And since no two projects are the same, it can be hard to generalize from experience.

Given all that, I shall now proceed to theorize about how to construct an environment for fostering technology development. And please note that government does not have to play a leading role. Instead, universities or even private entrepreneurs can and quite possibly should take the lead.

1. Technology incubators need first-class infrastructure. That’s a requirement, not a competitive advantage. They’re competing with developed-world facilities. In particular, bandwidth is utterly crucial — so much so that, if the country generally lags in that regard, “preferential” access to and pricing of bandwidth need to be arranged.

2. Similarly, technology incubators need to have or have proximity to first-class amenities. The individuals you most want to have working in them could, if they chose, probably get jobs in the US. And they’ll need to have meetings with individuals who visit from the US/Europe/etc. Gymnasiums, fast food, etc. — whatever techies expect in Boston or Frankfurt should also be available in the incubator. Indeed, this may be even more important than in developed countries, because working from home may not be a real option, making the office environment even more important. If you need a checklist of requirements, just take a look around Burlington or 1 Kendall Square or Silicon Valley or the Market St. area or the Flatiron District.

I first realized this point when I learned about how the Indian software services industry has been growing.

3. They should be physically structured so that people keep encountering each other. That’s a prejudice of mine from my university days. I selected my grad school (from among Harvard, MIT, and Chicago) based in part on its physical layout and people flows, and went from there to the Kennedy School, whose new building was carefully laid out for this purpose. I possibly learned more in dining halls and common areas and faculty dining rooms at Harvard than I did in classrooms. (In fact, I’m sure I did, given that I didn’t really go to a lot of classes there.) And the Sundeck Restaurant serves a similar purpose at the granddaddy of them all, 3000 Sand Hill Road. (Which incidentally is a complex owned by Stanford University.)

4. Rapid critical mass is important. Here’s where universities, government agencies, and/or larger companies are crucial — they can commit to being anchor tenants. The secondary services and serendiptious encounters that make incubators work rely on there being serious businesses or other relevant enterprises there in the first place. Somebody has to get the ball rolling. That’s the consistent message I carried away from TechLeb.

5. If business barriers are a problem elsewhere in the country, they need to be alleviated in the incubator. Just cutting taxes for companies in the zone can have a huge benefit — and incidentally can create a critical mass really quickly. The same would go for regulatory issues of all kinds, and for any infrastructure failings. If you are short on bandwidth, electricity, transportation, etc. — well, surely you have enough resources to supply them in a limited area. So pour everything you can muster into one place, and watch it thrive.

The classic model for an incubator is a “public/private partnership,” often with a university as a major partner. I suggest that while serious capital commitment needs to come from somewhere, and some government help is usually needed, government does NOT need to be the driving force, except perhaps when barrier-removal is a crucial aspect. In many countries, an entrepreneur who buys the right land (preferably near a university), hires the right people, has the right government and university relationships, and hires the right tech-business-savvy staff could make a huge difference on his own. (He doesn’t need tech industry relationships going in; sales and listening ability will do just fine as substitutes for preexisting know-who.)

And here’s what would be best of all — a global investment entity that seeks out local partners and creates such incubators/technology parks, one after the other, in a broad range of developing countries. They would really have the clout to kick-start things with tenants from global tech companies …


2 Responses to “Incubator possibilities and essentials in the developing world”

  1. The Monash Report»Blog Archive » Business sector selection for developing countries on May 23rd, 2006 5:08 pm

    […] That said, there are plenty of product-driven opportunities as well. Anybody could strike it rich with a dotcom success, whether global (Skype) or regional. Enterprise products localized for language, enterprise size, etc. are still needed in many categories, all around the world. Arabization is still a big opportunity, since global vendors haven’t done a great job with right-to-left languages. Particularly needed is a run-time screen-scraper so lightweight that it could be plopped willy-nilly on top of existing apps, localizing screens on the fly with acceptable performance. Fortunately, both dotcom and SaaS businesses have the option of locating their main servers offshore, should telecom service or data protection be deficient in their home countries. Frankly, I think just about every developing country should try to set up at least a small software/web incubator, if for no other reason than to ensure access to the best technology and web marketing for that country’s other businesses. […]

  2. The Monash Report»Blog Archive » Why an actual peace treaty is essential in Lebanon on July 31st, 2006 9:24 am

    […] I ran a panel at the recent TechLeb conference. On that panel, we extrapolated from the successful experiences of countries such as Ireland, India, and the United States itself, trying to figure out how best Lebanon could grow a technology industry, with all the benefits tech-led economic development brings. And there were lots of good, specific suggestions. But those details aren’t important now. What is essential — more than anything — is that there be a reliable peace. Nothing else matters – not pride, not vengeance, not even justice. Just a secure peace, internally and externally alike. […]

Leave a Reply

Feed including blog about enterprise technology strategy and public policy Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:


Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.