<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Monash Report &#187; Proofpoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/category/vendors/proofpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/guide-to-my-recent-research-on-computing-appliances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/guide-to-my-recent-research-on-computing-appliances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barracuda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Coat Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check Point Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing appliances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossbeam Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBMS vendors and technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC and VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proofpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and anti-spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sendio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/guide-to-my-recent-research-on-computing-appliances/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My recent flurry of research into computing appliances was spurred by a column I just submitted to Network World. In that column there’s a URL – pointing to this post – promising a guide to more details on that research.  Thus, here’s a set of links to my posts of the past few months [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">My recent flurry of research into computing appliances was spurred by a column I just submitted to <em>Network World.</em> In that column there’s a URL – pointing to this post – promising a guide to more details on that research.  Thus, here’s a set of links to my posts of the past few months on computing appliances, both here and on <em><a href="http://www.dbms2.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">DBMS2</a></em>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well.   (EDIT:  I actually gave names to three strategies &#8212; even if they were just &#8220;Type 0&#8243;, &#8220;Type 1&#8243;, and &#8220;Type 2&#8243; &#8212; in this <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">overview of data warehouse appliance vendors</a>.  And in another post I considered arguments about <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/23/arguments-against-data-warehouse-appliances/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">whether one would want a data warehouse appliance at all</a>.)  Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">Cast Iron Systems</a> (data integration), <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/" >Barracuda Networks</a> (security/antispam), <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/some-thoughts-from-bluecoat/" >Blue Coat Systems</a> (networking), and <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/juniper-networks-security-appliance/" >Juniper</a> (security and networking).&#8221;  (ANOTHER EDIT:  But I think <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">DATAllegro&#8217;s strategy has changed</a>.)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">By way of contrast, there’s also a group whose stance is more along “hardware/schmardware” lines.  <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/10/sendio-no-effective-response-to-the-niche-forever-challenge/" >Sendio</a> and Proofpoint (in most cases) don’t really do anything special at all in their boxes; what’s more, <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/12/proofpoint-and-vmware-%e2%80%93-an-apparently-non-trivial-virtual-appliance-success-story/" >Proofpoint</a> actually has significant software-only deployments over <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/03/virtual-appliances-saas/" >VMware</a>’s virtualization layer.  <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/10/05/introduction-to-kognitio-wx-2/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">Kognitio</a> and <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/08/12/greenplum-datallegro-netezza-comparison/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.dbms2.com');">Greenplum</a> think their software-only data warehouse offerings are appliance-equivalents too; indeed, Greenplum’s software is sold mainly bundled with Sun hardware (to the extent it’s sold at all), and Kognitio is hinting at an appliance-like offering for competitive reasons as well.  <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/check-point-software-virtual-appliance/" >Check Point Software</a> plays both sides of the field; it offers its own kind of “virtual appliance,” but also gets many of its sales through appliance vendors.  Its most interesting such partner, if not its biggest, is <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/crossbeam-systems-security-appliances-future/" >Crossbeam Systems</a>, which in my opinion may very well represent the future of appliance technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/18/guide-to-my-recent-research-on-computing-appliances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proofpoint and VMware – an apparently non-trivial virtual appliance success story</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/12/proofpoint-and-vmware-%e2%80%93-an-apparently-non-trivial-virtual-appliance-success-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/12/proofpoint-and-vmware-%e2%80%93-an-apparently-non-trivial-virtual-appliance-success-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies and products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing appliances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC and VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proofpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and anti-spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/12/proofpoint-and-vmware-%e2%80%93-an-apparently-non-trivial-virtual-appliance-success-story/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I talked with Proofpoint today, and got a more positive view about VMware’s virtual appliance strategy than I’ve gotten from other appliance vendors.  They cite over 500 downloads in the past couple of months, of which a significant fraction have turned into actual sales.  Specific deployment scenarios they mentioned include:

Demo (of course).
Tweak, test, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">I talked with Proofpoint today, and got a more positive view about <a href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/03/virtual-appliances-saas/" >VMware’s virtual appliance strategy</a> than I’ve gotten from other appliance vendors.  They cite over 500 downloads in the past couple of months, of which a significant fraction have turned into actual sales.  Specific deployment scenarios they mentioned include:</p>
<ul type="disc" style="margin-top: 0in">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Demo</strong> (of course).</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Tweak, test, deploy</strong> – between      patches and new anti-spam rulesets, Proofpoint users seem to have a rapid      change/test/deploy cycle.       Virtualization makes it possible to do that without having multiple      copies of an appliance.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Disaster recovery</strong> <strong>–</strong> this seems to      be a big one.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>“Surges” –</strong> depending on what the      bad guys are doing, one’s need for anti-spam servers can go up and down in      a hurry.  Virtualization makes it      easy to respond.</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-128"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It probably is not coincidental that Proofpoint makes less use of custom hardware that many other appliance vendors.  In most cases, Proofpoint just buys servers from a vendor such as Dell and fiddles with their packaging.  For some applications it does add enhanced networking capabilities, as other appliance vendors do; while I neglected to ask explicitly, I got the impression these weren’t the ones commonly deployed on VMware.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Proofpoint said that very few of its customers bought VMware in connection with their Proofpoint deployments; except in a couple of cases, they already had it and were using it for other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/12/proofpoint-and-vmware-%e2%80%93-an-apparently-non-trivial-virtual-appliance-success-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
