<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early thoughts on outsourcing to Google Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-67682</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-67682</guid>
		<description>Curt,

I really balked at not being able to sort in Gmail at first. I think the paradigm is very much archive everything and then search.

Once I learned the "special" Gmail search syntax I found it to be better than sorting and probably quicker to boot. 


Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt,</p>
<p>I really balked at not being able to sort in Gmail at first. I think the paradigm is very much archive everything and then search.</p>
<p>Once I learned the &#8220;special&#8221; Gmail search syntax I found it to be better than sorting and probably quicker to boot. </p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 trends that could shake up the text analytics market &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-66701</link>
		<dc:creator>6 trends that could shake up the text analytics market &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-66701</guid>
		<description>[...] The compelling case for letting Google handle your enterprise email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The compelling case for letting Google handle your enterprise email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; We&#8217;re having a bit of a rocky server transition</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52518</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; We&#8217;re having a bit of a rocky server transition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52518</guid>
		<description>[...] dbms2.com email &#8212; which is what most of you use &#8212; is down at the moment. monash.com email, which is hosted by Google, seems just fine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dbms2.com email &#8212; which is what most of you use &#8212; is down at the moment. monash.com email, which is hosted by Google, seems just fine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ferris</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52233</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ferris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52233</guid>
		<description>We try very hard to avoid biases. I'd be happy to address any specific concerns the prior poster has. It would also be helpful to know who the poster is, to understand their background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We try very hard to avoid biases. I&#8217;d be happy to address any specific concerns the prior poster has. It would also be helpful to know who the poster is, to understand their background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking On</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52138</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52138</guid>
		<description>Curt, 

I'm surprised (although mildly) that you think so highly of Ferris research. Although I prefer in this instance to remain anonymous (ostensibly, to protect my employer) I can perhaps ask that you look into the conflicts of interest that Ferris' analysts covering messaging and archiving will exhibit under public scrutiny. Although Ferris makes no play to hide it particularly, those two analysts work for archiving vendors. A top-tier analyst should strive to be impartial in all regards, and a number of industry voices are murmuring that Ferris is definitely not around archiving. Of course, Ferris has stimulated a lot of debate about various markets within the industry that we all think is highly valuable, and at least the analyst you mention appears to be independent - and I'm not about to mock his operation from an anonymous high! Those aspects are valuable. However, I don't think that Ferris is about to rival Gartner any time soon.  

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised (although mildly) that you think so highly of Ferris research. Although I prefer in this instance to remain anonymous (ostensibly, to protect my employer) I can perhaps ask that you look into the conflicts of interest that Ferris&#8217; analysts covering messaging and archiving will exhibit under public scrutiny. Although Ferris makes no play to hide it particularly, those two analysts work for archiving vendors. A top-tier analyst should strive to be impartial in all regards, and a number of industry voices are murmuring that Ferris is definitely not around archiving. Of course, Ferris has stimulated a lot of debate about various markets within the industry that we all think is highly valuable, and at least the analyst you mention appears to be independent - and I&#8217;m not about to mock his operation from an anonymous high! Those aspects are valuable. However, I don&#8217;t think that Ferris is about to rival Gartner any time soon.  </p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48431</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48431</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve.  You're only the second person who bothered to point that out, so I really appreciate the trouble you took to do so.

But in the event, that was a wholly separate problem.  I had problems setting up the domain for www.strategicmessaging.com, and in the back-and-forth softwarememories.com got zapped.  It's back now.

Coming so soon after the other problem, I hated it, as I'm sure you and my other readers did too. :(

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve.  You&#8217;re only the second person who bothered to point that out, so I really appreciate the trouble you took to do so.</p>
<p>But in the event, that was a wholly separate problem.  I had problems setting up the domain for <a href="http://www.strategicmessaging.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.strategicmessaging.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.strategicmessaging.com</a>, and in the back-and-forth softwarememories.com got zapped.  It&#8217;s back now.</p>
<p>Coming so soon after the other problem, I hated it, as I&#8217;m sure you and my other readers did too. <img src='http://www.monashreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hochschild</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48400</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hochschild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48400</guid>
		<description>You may still have problems: The Software Memories link drops me to the files system, and this morning's feedblitz  gave an error message.  Good Luck!

steveh


 
Here are the latest updates for shochschild@pervasive.com
"Monash Information Services" - 1 new article
1.	Error reading source feed.
2.	More Recent Articles
Error reading source feed.
Error reading source feed http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-atom.php: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error. 
• Email to a friend • Related •</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may still have problems: The Software Memories link drops me to the files system, and this morning&#8217;s feedblitz  gave an error message.  Good Luck!</p>
<p>steveh</p>
<p>Here are the latest updates for <a href="mailto:shochschild@pervasive.com">shochschild@pervasive.com</a><br />
&#8220;Monash Information Services&#8221; - 1 new article<br />
1.	Error reading source feed.<br />
2.	More Recent Articles<br />
Error reading source feed.<br />
Error reading source feed <a href="http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-atom.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.softwarememories.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-atom.php</a>: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.<br />
• Email to a friend • Related •</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.128 seconds -->
