<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early thoughts on outsourcing to Google Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google declares total war on Microsoft &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-105595</link>
		<dc:creator>Google declares total war on Microsoft &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-105595</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft Word, Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SharePoint, and more,&#8221; or for that matter than Google Mail and the rest of Google Apps. Taken together, Google&#8217;s initiatives suggest that an all-out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Word, Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SharePoint, and more,&#8221; or for that matter than Google Mail and the rest of Google Apps. Taken together, Google&#8217;s initiatives suggest that an all-out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Wave &#8212; finally a Microsoft killer? &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-102987</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Wave &#8212; finally a Microsoft killer? &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-102987</guid>
		<description>[...] its cloud-based offerings to make a huge dent in Microsoft&#8217;s market. But even with its flaws Google has already been a good alternative for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its cloud-based offerings to make a huge dent in Microsoft&#8217;s market. But even with its flaws Google has already been a good alternative for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-67682</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-67682</guid>
		<description>Curt,

I really balked at not being able to sort in Gmail at first. I think the paradigm is very much archive everything and then search.

Once I learned the &quot;special&quot; Gmail search syntax I found it to be better than sorting and probably quicker to boot. 


Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt,</p>
<p>I really balked at not being able to sort in Gmail at first. I think the paradigm is very much archive everything and then search.</p>
<p>Once I learned the &#8220;special&#8221; Gmail search syntax I found it to be better than sorting and probably quicker to boot. </p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 trends that could shake up the text analytics market &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-66701</link>
		<dc:creator>6 trends that could shake up the text analytics market &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-66701</guid>
		<description>[...] The compelling case for letting Google handle your enterprise email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The compelling case for letting Google handle your enterprise email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; We&#8217;re having a bit of a rocky server transition</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52518</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; We&#8217;re having a bit of a rocky server transition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52518</guid>
		<description>[...] dbms2.com email &#8212; which is what most of you use &#8212; is down at the moment. monash.com email, which is hosted by Google, seems just fine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dbms2.com email &#8212; which is what most of you use &#8212; is down at the moment. monash.com email, which is hosted by Google, seems just fine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ferris</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52233</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ferris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52233</guid>
		<description>We try very hard to avoid biases. I&#039;d be happy to address any specific concerns the prior poster has. It would also be helpful to know who the poster is, to understand their background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We try very hard to avoid biases. I&#8217;d be happy to address any specific concerns the prior poster has. It would also be helpful to know who the poster is, to understand their background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking On</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52138</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-52138</guid>
		<description>Curt, 

I&#039;m surprised (although mildly) that you think so highly of Ferris research. Although I prefer in this instance to remain anonymous (ostensibly, to protect my employer) I can perhaps ask that you look into the conflicts of interest that Ferris&#039; analysts covering messaging and archiving will exhibit under public scrutiny. Although Ferris makes no play to hide it particularly, those two analysts work for archiving vendors. A top-tier analyst should strive to be impartial in all regards, and a number of industry voices are murmuring that Ferris is definitely not around archiving. Of course, Ferris has stimulated a lot of debate about various markets within the industry that we all think is highly valuable, and at least the analyst you mention appears to be independent - and I&#039;m not about to mock his operation from an anonymous high! Those aspects are valuable. However, I don&#039;t think that Ferris is about to rival Gartner any time soon.  

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised (although mildly) that you think so highly of Ferris research. Although I prefer in this instance to remain anonymous (ostensibly, to protect my employer) I can perhaps ask that you look into the conflicts of interest that Ferris&#8217; analysts covering messaging and archiving will exhibit under public scrutiny. Although Ferris makes no play to hide it particularly, those two analysts work for archiving vendors. A top-tier analyst should strive to be impartial in all regards, and a number of industry voices are murmuring that Ferris is definitely not around archiving. Of course, Ferris has stimulated a lot of debate about various markets within the industry that we all think is highly valuable, and at least the analyst you mention appears to be independent &#8211; and I&#8217;m not about to mock his operation from an anonymous high! Those aspects are valuable. However, I don&#8217;t think that Ferris is about to rival Gartner any time soon.  </p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48431</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48431</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve.  You&#039;re only the second person who bothered to point that out, so I really appreciate the trouble you took to do so.

But in the event, that was a wholly separate problem.  I had problems setting up the domain for www.strategicmessaging.com, and in the back-and-forth softwarememories.com got zapped.  It&#039;s back now.

Coming so soon after the other problem, I hated it, as I&#039;m sure you and my other readers did too. :(

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve.  You&#8217;re only the second person who bothered to point that out, so I really appreciate the trouble you took to do so.</p>
<p>But in the event, that was a wholly separate problem.  I had problems setting up the domain for <a href="http://www.strategicmessaging.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.strategicmessaging.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.strategicmessaging.com</a>, and in the back-and-forth softwarememories.com got zapped.  It&#8217;s back now.</p>
<p>Coming so soon after the other problem, I hated it, as I&#8217;m sure you and my other readers did too. <img src='http://www.monashreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hochschild</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48400</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hochschild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2008/01/04/early-thoughts-on-outsourcing-to-google-mail/#comment-48400</guid>
		<description>You may still have problems: The Software Memories link drops me to the files system, and this morning&#039;s feedblitz  gave an error message.  Good Luck!

steveh


 
Here are the latest updates for shochschild@pervasive.com
&quot;Monash Information Services&quot; - 1 new article
1.	Error reading source feed.
2.	More Recent Articles
Error reading source feed.
Error reading source feed http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-atom.php: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error. 
• Email to a friend • Related •</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may still have problems: The Software Memories link drops me to the files system, and this morning&#8217;s feedblitz  gave an error message.  Good Luck!</p>
<p>steveh</p>
<p>Here are the latest updates for <a href="mailto:shochschild@pervasive.com">shochschild@pervasive.com</a><br />
&#8220;Monash Information Services&#8221; &#8211; 1 new article<br />
1.	Error reading source feed.<br />
2.	More Recent Articles<br />
Error reading source feed.<br />
Error reading source feed <a href="http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-atom.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.softwarememories.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.softwarememories.com/wp-atom.php</a>: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.<br />
• Email to a friend • Related •</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

