<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAP ByDemand could work a lot better than critics think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:52:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oracle and SAP outline different market strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-62963</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oracle and SAP outline different market strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-62963</guid>
		<description>[...] SAP has famously rewritten its apps for new environments a couple of times, most notably in the R3 release that first took technology to RDBMS-based client/server platforms. And Larry&#8217;s gibes notwithstanding, it&#8217;s very reasonable to expect that SAP will figure out how to make the SaaS (Software as a Service) business work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SAP has famously rewritten its apps for new environments a couple of times, most notably in the R3 release that first took technology to RDBMS-based client/server platforms. And Larry&#8217;s gibes notwithstanding, it&#8217;s very reasonable to expect that SAP will figure out how to make the SaaS (Software as a Service) business work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; I repeat &#8212; SaaS is not necessarily an indirect-channels business</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-57641</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; I repeat &#8212; SaaS is not necessarily an indirect-channels business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-57641</guid>
		<description>[...] Looking back, I should have quoted that in support when I wrote: By the way, I think the assumption SAP needs to sell ByDemand via indirect channels is an erroneous one. (Dennis Howlett seems to be at least partway to recognizing this. He also reports that SAP realizes that this is truly a sales issue.) Hence my stress on SAP’s internal sales management issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Looking back, I should have quoted that in support when I wrote: By the way, I think the assumption SAP needs to sell ByDemand via indirect channels is an erroneous one. (Dennis Howlett seems to be at least partway to recognizing this. He also reports that SAP realizes that this is truly a sales issue.) Hence my stress on SAP’s internal sales management issues. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-33271</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-33271</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the thing, Dennis -- there&#039;s no logical reason for SAP to rely on indirect sales at all!  The classical channel model is to run product sales at what would be a loss if you allocated all sales costs to products, then make your profits on sales of high-margin services. 

But SAP has already suggested ByDemand doesn&#039;t fit that model.  

When I first became a software stock analyst in 1981, a lot of application software salesman were former ADP branch managers.  ADP had a great sales machine; they just didn&#039;t pay their guys a lot.  SAP, in my opinion, should and probably needs to build something similar.

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing, Dennis &#8212; there&#8217;s no logical reason for SAP to rely on indirect sales at all!  The classical channel model is to run product sales at what would be a loss if you allocated all sales costs to products, then make your profits on sales of high-margin services. </p>
<p>But SAP has already suggested ByDemand doesn&#8217;t fit that model.  </p>
<p>When I first became a software stock analyst in 1981, a lot of application software salesman were former ADP branch managers.  ADP had a great sales machine; they just didn&#8217;t pay their guys a lot.  SAP, in my opinion, should and probably needs to build something similar.</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-33235</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-33235</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the hat tip. Just to be clear, my remarks are based not just on my personal view but those of a clutch of my Irregular colleagues plus our interpretation of what Kagermann, Apotheker and Zencke said to us in our meetings.

The channel issue is real. Web/telesales alone will not get SAP to where it says it wants to be. There are ongoing concerns by many people that SAP has not figured out how it will deal with channel issues. The answers we received are way too vague at this time and have been for more than 6 months. 

@Cornel: This is SAPs nth attempt at a mid-market offering and BusinessOne can hardly be called a &#039;well thought out&#039; when it was acquired and still has limited traction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the hat tip. Just to be clear, my remarks are based not just on my personal view but those of a clutch of my Irregular colleagues plus our interpretation of what Kagermann, Apotheker and Zencke said to us in our meetings.</p>
<p>The channel issue is real. Web/telesales alone will not get SAP to where it says it wants to be. There are ongoing concerns by many people that SAP has not figured out how it will deal with channel issues. The answers we received are way too vague at this time and have been for more than 6 months. </p>
<p>@Cornel: This is SAPs nth attempt at a mid-market offering and BusinessOne can hardly be called a &#8216;well thought out&#8217; when it was acquired and still has limited traction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornel Schoeman</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-33010</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornel Schoeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/09/25/sap-bydemand-could-work-a-lot-better-than-critics-think/#comment-33010</guid>
		<description>SAP has been known to take on unchartered waters - and make a huge success out of it.  The criticism from mayor role players could all be relevant or not.  From my experience SAP has only launched well thought through products, and Business By Design would be one of these again.  It&#039;s all about the customers - if they believe and take up the product, that will be the ultimate success.

Cornel Schoeman
Britton Solutions
http://www.businessone.co.za</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAP has been known to take on unchartered waters &#8211; and make a huge success out of it.  The criticism from mayor role players could all be relevant or not.  From my experience SAP has only launched well thought through products, and Business By Design would be one of these again.  It&#8217;s all about the customers &#8211; if they believe and take up the product, that will be the ultimate success.</p>
<p>Cornel Schoeman<br />
Britton Solutions<br />
<a href="http://www.businessone.co.za" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.businessone.co.za');" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessone.co.za</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
