<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appliances &#8212; my conclusions!  (For now, at least)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:52:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Clustrix story &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/#comment-124889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Clustrix story &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 08:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/#comment-124889</guid>
		<description>[...] Clustrix makes Type I appliances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clustrix makes Type I appliances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Check Point Systems UTM-1 and Crossbeam Systems – resolving the confusion &#124; The Monash Report</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/#comment-67264</link>
		<dc:creator>Check Point Systems UTM-1 and Crossbeam Systems – resolving the confusion &#124; The Monash Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/#comment-67264</guid>
		<description>[...] Crossbeam C-Series &#8212; and hence also the new Check Point UTM-1 – are indeed classic Type 1 appliances. The biggest difference vs. generic Dell/HP/whatever servers is the density of Ethernet ports (4-8 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Crossbeam C-Series &#8212; and hence also the new Check Point UTM-1 – are indeed classic Type 1 appliances. The biggest difference vs. generic Dell/HP/whatever servers is the density of Ethernet ports (4-8 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Ingres tries to become relevant again</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/#comment-6277</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Ingres tries to become relevant again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2007/01/29/computing-appliances-trends/#comment-6277</guid>
		<description>[...] Ingres has just announced Icebreaker, a virtual appliance combining the Ingres database and elements of rPath Linux. No decision has been made to offer Icebreaker as a physical appliance; if such is offered, it will only be Type II, with no custom hardware. As the name suggests, Ingres hopes Icebreaker will help it attract interest from new-name accounts. I don’t think this will succeed much at first, because of administrability issues. But assuming those get fixed, Ingres has some interesting ideas for the future. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ingres has just announced Icebreaker, a virtual appliance combining the Ingres database and elements of rPath Linux. No decision has been made to offer Icebreaker as a physical appliance; if such is offered, it will only be Type II, with no custom hardware. As the name suggests, Ingres hopes Icebreaker will help it attract interest from new-name accounts. I don’t think this will succeed much at first, because of administrability issues. But assuming those get fixed, Ingres has some interesting ideas for the future. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
