<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computing appliances &#8212; architected for network stream processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:11:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/#comment-4945</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/#comment-4945</guid>
		<description>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Sendio &#8212; no effective response to the niche-forever challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Sendio &#8212; no effective response to the niche-forever challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2006/12/27/appliances-barracuda-network-stream-processing/#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>[...] Sendio boasts almost 150 customer enterprises, concentrated in such security-sensitive markets such as financial services, healthcare, and legal services. (One advantage of being security-sensitive may be that your correspondents are open-minded to enduring the challenge/response hassle.) As per a glowing review in Government Computer News – which incidentally takes a swipe at Barracuda – spammers so far do not bother doing anything to defeat the system. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sendio boasts almost 150 customer enterprises, concentrated in such security-sensitive markets such as financial services, healthcare, and legal services. (One advantage of being security-sensitive may be that your correspondents are open-minded to enduring the challenge/response hassle.) As per a glowing review in Government Computer News – which incidentally takes a swipe at Barracuda – spammers so far do not bother doing anything to defeat the system. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
