<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymizer &#8212; internet privacy through anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:52:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonimizador</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/#comment-18283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonimizador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/#comment-18283</guid>
		<description>In http://www.anonimizador.com the software is free...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.anonimizador.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.anonimizador.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.anonimizador.com</a> the software is free&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Does web text mining need to be cloaked?</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/#comment-3820</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Does web text mining need to be cloaked?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/#comment-3820</guid>
		<description>[...] If any of this is an issue for you, you should take a look at Anonymizer’s growing enterprise offering. Apparently, there are commercial enterprises using thousands of seats each of Anonymizer’s cloaking service.      &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If any of this is an issue for you, you should take a look at Anonymizer’s growing enterprise offering. Apparently, there are commercial enterprises using thousands of seats each of Anonymizer’s cloaking service.      &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Anonymizer – penetrating the Great Firewalls of China and Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/#comment-3818</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Anonymizer – penetrating the Great Firewalls of China and Iran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2006/11/30/anonymizer-privacy-anonymous-web-email/#comment-3818</guid>
		<description>[...] Lance Cottrell of Anonymizer is one of those rare guys who make me believe he started a company in no small part to do good. And so his cloaking-technology company is providing free services to help Chinese citizens sneak through their national firewall, and is doing the same thing for Iran on a paid basis, under contract to the Voice of America. I think this is wonderful, and he reports that it’s working well now. Even so, I think there are scalability concerns. Right now only 10s of 1000s of users are covered. If there were a few more zeroes on that, standard spam-blocking techniques, currently ineffective, might work. What’s more, the Chinese bureaucracy, currently not highly motivated to shut the service down, might bestir itself to be much more effective. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lance Cottrell of Anonymizer is one of those rare guys who make me believe he started a company in no small part to do good. And so his cloaking-technology company is providing free services to help Chinese citizens sneak through their national firewall, and is doing the same thing for Iran on a paid basis, under contract to the Voice of America. I think this is wonderful, and he reports that it’s working well now. Even so, I think there are scalability concerns. Right now only 10s of 1000s of users are covered. If there were a few more zeroes on that, standard spam-blocking techniques, currently ineffective, might work. What’s more, the Chinese bureaucracy, currently not highly motivated to shut the service down, might bestir itself to be much more effective. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
