<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple legislative language for Tariff Rebate Passthrough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2006/06/26/simple-legislative-language-for-tariff-rebate-passthrough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/06/26/simple-legislative-language-for-tariff-rebate-passthrough/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Unlocking fiscal from technical architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2006/06/26/simple-legislative-language-for-tariff-rebate-passthrough/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Unlocking fiscal from technical architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashreport.com/2006/06/26/simple-legislative-language-for-tariff-rebate-passthrough/#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>[...] Martin Geddes of Telepocalypse is kind enough to call Tariff Rebate Passthrough &#8220;the first new idea I’ve seen in a long time on the stale network neutrality debate.&#8221; He goes on to express concern about the practicality of the idea, but hopefully I addressed that somewhat in subsequent posts. While there certainly are major systems to build, which I acknowledge, I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s worse than what would be needed if the telcos&#8217; preferred bill successfully makes it through Congress.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Martin Geddes of Telepocalypse is kind enough to call Tariff Rebate Passthrough &#8220;the first new idea I’ve seen in a long time on the stale network neutrality debate.&#8221; He goes on to express concern about the practicality of the idea, but hopefully I addressed that somewhat in subsequent posts. While there certainly are major systems to build, which I acknowledge, I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s worse than what would be needed if the telcos&#8217; preferred bill successfully makes it through Congress.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

