<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Oracle headed for hard times?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashreport.com/2005/11/21/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2005/11/21/10/</link>
	<description>Technology ... politics ... marketing ... strategy ... life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Is Oracle losing its edge?</title>
		<link>http://www.monashreport.com/2005/11/21/10/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Is Oracle losing its edge?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 10:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monashreport.com/?p=10#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Over in the Monash Report, I posed the question: Is Oracle losing its edge in DBMS? Here are some of the data points that make me suspect it has. A number of these points also apply to the other large mainstream DBMS vendors; a number, however, do not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over in the Monash Report, I posed the question: Is Oracle losing its edge in DBMS? Here are some of the data points that make me suspect it has. A number of these points also apply to the other large mainstream DBMS vendors; a number, however, do not. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.117 seconds -->
